Wise Timetable

Switching

CELCAT, module by module

CELCAT and Wise Timetable are built on the same British academic conventions and much of the vocabulary is shared already — clash-free, constraints, resources, registers. This page covers the parts that are not.

The Wise Timetable week viewed by room, the equivalent of CELCAT rooming and room booking
Viewed by room. CELCAT sells Rooming only as its own mode; here it is the same timetable seen down a different axis.

The shared half

Both systems say clash rather than conflict, separate hard constraints from soft preferences, and treat rooms, staff and equipment as resources an event draws on. An institution moving between them is not learning a new way of thinking about a timetable, which makes the comparison unusually direct: it is about what each does, not about what each means.

CELCAT to Wise Timetable

CELCATHereNote
Interactive TimetablingThe desktop plannerDrag, drop, and an immediate clash warning.
Automated TimetablingAutomatic generationRules in, complete timetable out.
Rooming onlyRoom allocation for pre-scheduled eventsTimes already fixed, rooms found around them.
Room BookingRoom bookingIncluded in the licence rather than an extension.
Attendance MonitoringAttendance monitoringHere it is a rotating QR code rather than a card tap.
Exam SchedulingExam schedulingSeating, invigilators, student-level clash checking.
ReportingTimetable reportsSpace utilisation, workload, unallocated sessions.
Pay ClaimLecturer payment reportsA separate product there; part of the licence here. See the note below.
PublishingWeb publishingPages served with your branding.
CELCAT Calendar, CELCAT WebThe student timetable portalNo account, no install, five view modes.
NowMobile appsFree iOS and Android, included in every licence.
PlasmaDigital signageScreens in the foyer, driven from the live timetable.

Pay Claim, and how it is answered here

CELCAT sells payment against teaching delivered as a separate product. Wise Timetable does that work inside the timetable rather than beside it, and it is worth being precise about what that does and does not mean.

Each lecturer carries their own hourly rates, and the rates can differ by the kind of session — a lecture, a laboratory and a seminar need not be paid the same — or by the study programme. Everyone can be on a different contract, because the rate table holds a line per person. The report then reads what each lecturer actually taught over a period you choose and works out the money, per programme and per kind of session, as a spreadsheet the accounts department can work from, or as a flat one-row-per-session file for a payroll system that would rather do its own arithmetic. Paying lecturers from the timetable sets out how it is configured and what it counts.

What it is not is a claims workflow. There is no form for a member of staff to submit, no approval chain behind it and no payslip at the end — the office produces the figures from what the timetable records. If the workflow rather than the figures is why your institution bought CELCAT, that is worth raising in the first conversation rather than the fourth.

What actually has to move

Rooms, staff, modules, student sets and the constraint set — and because the two systems think alike, the constraint set usually transfers as a set of decisions rather than as a translation exercise.

Wise Timetable reads Excel, CSV, XML and a documented REST API. There is no CELCAT-specific importer and this page will not imply one.

The wider question is in changing timetabling system.

Want to see this working?

Book a 45-minute online presentation and we will walk through it against your institution's own scheduling problem.